[ESPN Stats and Info] The Cavaliers were the only team this season that didn’t have a single 20-point loss. No team had been held under 80 points this entire NBA campaign. Until tonight, when the Knicks defeated the Cavs 99-79 at the Garden.
The Cavaliers were the only team this season that didn't have a single 20-point loss.
No team had been held under 80 points this entire NBA campaign.
Until tonight, when the Knicks defeated the Cavs 99-79 at the Garden. pic.twitter.com/nd2wgDb6Q9
— ESPN Stats & Info (@ESPNStatsInfo) April 22, 2023
by horseshoeoverlook
28 Comments
darius garland is a basketball terrorist and he will be tried for his war crimes
Had them looking crazy lmao
Let’s go knicks
Either win on Sunday or series is cooked. Cavs are going to have to find a way to win at MSG
Entire Cavs team put into Jail by the Knicks
Classic Knicks defense
Go New York Go New York Go
Thibs basketball baby
MSG was fucking cooking tonight bro
I didn’t think scoring only 79 points in the modern NBA was even possible. That is impressively bad. 19/14/50 shooting splits for Garland lol.
Ayo Darius Garland went 4/21 trying to put up today’s date type percentages.
Not built for those MSG lights unfortunately
Say bye bye to the double big Cavs lineup after this season. Too much lack of offense when those two are on the court. Either that or get a respectable SF. Honestly should probably do both tho.
2004 pistons type game
Thibs defense goes hard
Straight clamps
Shades of rookie year Garland lmao
[ESPN Stats and Info] The Cavaliers fucking sucked ass tonight
Basketball at its finest
Mavs fans rolling over in their graves.
This is a score from the 90’s, what the fuck happened?
They have Tim Duncan/Giannis/KG hybrid tho
I hate it here
Pistons held opponents under 70 points 6 times in the playoffs back in 04. How far we’ve come in 20 years.
The 90s Knicks vs Cavs are back!
You have to be special kind of bad to not score 80 in today’s game.
There was an 81 point first half just this week.
The cavs never lost by 20 in the whole season? Do they mean precisely 20 or >20?