That would have been the dynasty extender for sure.
ezioauditore00789
Hindsight 2023 Halliburton and Brock would be best buddies. Only player I wanted to draft in that class who had less question marks.
TheRealStephCurry30
Absolute fumble taking Wise at #2. So depressing
InevitableBudget510
Timberwolves had two chances to pick Steph. Who cares
Bobstar447
Hindsight is 20/20. I do think recent drafts have proved a lesson about ” win now players”. Sometimes these guys have higher ceilings than we give them credit for and they already have skill sets that will translate to the NBA and prevent them from being complete busts.
Just some players that come to mind that were thrown around: Devin Vassel, Franz Wagner, Deni Avdija, Tyrese Haliburton, Davion Mitchell, Desmond Bane, and Trey Murphy. All these guys were viewed as not having the highest ceiling but were high IQ players that committed on defense and had skillsets that would immediately translate to the NBA.
jcquinn8
Lmao the Ronaldo fan account tweet below it saying “we” as if they did anything
zfztate
hindsight being 20/20 I like to have haliburton or bane. Both are great players now. They may have had less minutes to develop with us. Interesting to think about what could have been. Past is past, no need to dwell on it too much
Oh_no_bros
It would be nice but no team would have been taking Halliburton at 2 at the time.
eexxiitt
Having him on the team would’ve made the 2 timeline plan successful.
Dynasty_30
Just goes to show how important the draft is
You miss in the draft and it can derail your team for years
beezybreezy
Lots of teams passed on Haliburton. That said, Kerr did say he wanted him. 🙁
dating_derp
Ya in hindsight, it would’ve been great taking Hali. Imagine the last 2 seasons if we had him as a backup PG instead of Chiozza and Ty.
But if he was our bench player, he would not have developed nearly as fast as he has being a starter. That’s the problem with taking big projects on a win now / contending team. They’re not going to develop as quickly as we need them to. Not saying he was a big project necessarily. Just speaking in general.
barktothefuture
He was such a perfect fit for this team, I’m still pissed we didn’t take him.
muzinger
That draft class just sucked in general. So in hindsight I’m not that pissed off the Warriors missed on Wiseman. They swung for the fences and missed. I can live with it considering their the team’s success for the past several years. But if there was one player I do think, it’s Halliburton. He would have been great.
pogman2124
WE WERENT IN THE MLS AT 35
redditatwork415
i can see the logic behind drafting wise, kuminga, and moody.
Imagine the warriors took the absolute best players in the slots that wiseman, kuminga, and moody were drafted in.
We are probably looking at Haliburton, Franz, and Trey Murphy.
After Steph, Klay, and Dray retire, is a team built around those 3 winning a title? I have a tough time seeing that.
The warriors went with high ceiling guys for the chance at getting an all-nba first team-type guy so they can extend the window when the big 3 are gone.
16 Comments
That would have been the dynasty extender for sure.
Hindsight 2023 Halliburton and Brock would be best buddies. Only player I wanted to draft in that class who had less question marks.
Absolute fumble taking Wise at #2. So depressing
Timberwolves had two chances to pick Steph. Who cares
Hindsight is 20/20. I do think recent drafts have proved a lesson about ” win now players”. Sometimes these guys have higher ceilings than we give them credit for and they already have skill sets that will translate to the NBA and prevent them from being complete busts.
Just some players that come to mind that were thrown around: Devin Vassel, Franz Wagner, Deni Avdija, Tyrese Haliburton, Davion Mitchell, Desmond Bane, and Trey Murphy. All these guys were viewed as not having the highest ceiling but were high IQ players that committed on defense and had skillsets that would immediately translate to the NBA.
Lmao the Ronaldo fan account tweet below it saying “we” as if they did anything
hindsight being 20/20 I like to have haliburton or bane. Both are great players now. They may have had less minutes to develop with us. Interesting to think about what could have been. Past is past, no need to dwell on it too much
It would be nice but no team would have been taking Halliburton at 2 at the time.
Having him on the team would’ve made the 2 timeline plan successful.
Just goes to show how important the draft is
You miss in the draft and it can derail your team for years
Lots of teams passed on Haliburton. That said, Kerr did say he wanted him. 🙁
Ya in hindsight, it would’ve been great taking Hali. Imagine the last 2 seasons if we had him as a backup PG instead of Chiozza and Ty.
But if he was our bench player, he would not have developed nearly as fast as he has being a starter. That’s the problem with taking big projects on a win now / contending team. They’re not going to develop as quickly as we need them to. Not saying he was a big project necessarily. Just speaking in general.
He was such a perfect fit for this team, I’m still pissed we didn’t take him.
That draft class just sucked in general. So in hindsight I’m not that pissed off the Warriors missed on Wiseman. They swung for the fences and missed. I can live with it considering their the team’s success for the past several years. But if there was one player I do think, it’s Halliburton. He would have been great.
WE WERENT IN THE MLS AT 35
i can see the logic behind drafting wise, kuminga, and moody.
Imagine the warriors took the absolute best players in the slots that wiseman, kuminga, and moody were drafted in.
We are probably looking at Haliburton, Franz, and Trey Murphy.
After Steph, Klay, and Dray retire, is a team built around those 3 winning a title? I have a tough time seeing that.
The warriors went with high ceiling guys for the chance at getting an all-nba first team-type guy so they can extend the window when the big 3 are gone.