The New York Knicks have been linked to Zach LaVine since the trade deadline of last season, so it’s no surprise to hear that Knicks attempted to trade for LaVine. However, the Knicks never made the decision to trade for the Bulls All-Star and recent reports may help indicate why. We also look at the Knicks current interest level in trading for Karl-Anthony Towns. Troy Mahabir breaks all of this down!
SHOW CHAPTERS:
00:00 – Intro
00:26 – Knicks Explored Zach LaVine Trade
05:39 – Knicks Current Interest Level In KAT
09:38 – Why The Knicks & Towns Are Constantly Linked
Catch the latest special interviews, shorts, fan interactions, and more by subscribing to the channel here! https://www.youtube.com/@TheKnicksRecap
Follow The Knicks Recap on all social media platforms!
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheKnicksRecap
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/TheKnicksRecap/
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/u/TheKnicksRecap?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheKnicksRecap/
Rather Listen to The Knicks Recap? Catch us on ALL of your favorite streaming platforms:
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3SKSl8o
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3QrEfr6
iHeart Radio: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-the-knicks-recap-a-new-yor-100895112/
Amazon Music: https://amzn.to/3QoZrOd
Other Pod Channels: https://anchor.fm/the-knicks-recap
Grab our MERCH featuring some of the graphics you’ve seen us create to take your Knicks fandom to the NEXT LEVEL: https://www.teepublic.com/user/the-knicks-recap
DONATE TO THE SHOW:
PayPal: troymahabir@yahoo.com
Have a comment about the show, an interview, or a graphic idea? Reach out to The Knicks Recap on ALL SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS!
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. All clips property of the NBA. No copyright infringement is intended, all videos are edited to follow the “Free Use” guideline of YouTube.
15 Comments
Lame, you tease us with “asking price reveal” and then you make up a trade scenario.
So what was the price you phony? We aren't saying anything, we are pressing play to hear the God damn price. 👎🏽
Hit the thumbs down on this one👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏻👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👍🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽
This front office is smart years ago we would've give up the whole team for one player remember Melo. GO KNICKS
Sadly….this is the approach all of these front offices are taking……ask for a RIDICULOUS price for trades…..that's why Dame and Harden haven't been moved yet…..its a high price game of chicken…..its gonna take a while before these sides get closer to reality
Everyone think it's the same old ny knicks,they give the house for little
Kat is exactly want ny knick need he is scorer an good rebounder,
Are the knicksgoing to get Zach Lavine
Lavine not a superstar it’s not worth it 😂
Bulls have overvalued Zack. Nice player and he’ll be better 1 year removed from injury, but he’s not a #1 option. He’s a 2 or 3, and average defender. If his defense was better his value would be much higher. We need a wing player who must be able to d up. Same reason Kat is no good with no defense and if Mitch is gone, we become a horrible defensive team. Stay smart.
Why would you assume that The Knicks would give up the whole team for Zach..🤦🏾♂️‼️F*ck Zach, Rich and Clutch. The Knicks don't want him anyway. People complain about JuJu, but Zach wouldn't be a huge upgrade. Zach has a nice squad in Chi, which includes DeRozan and they aren't better than us. That should tell you something.
Hey been following you for a while and like your content. But please don't tell me zach levine trade asking price reveal and you don't reveal anything. Thanks
He's a way better defender than RJ Barrett, not even close. He's a way better offensive player, than RJ Barrett, not even close. I would trade RJ in a minute, but you are right, I'm not giving up that much to get Zach LaVine. That's way too much
Zach Lavine's progression is a good argument for keeping RJ (not that we would likely trade him). Lavine's production really took off during his 5th year in the league. People often say that you know what kind of player somebody is going to be after 3 or 4 years. However, Lavine arguably showed otherwise and perhaps RJ will likewise begin to hit his stride next year.
I rather have Lavine…