Mastodon
@Chicago Bulls

The NBA Franchise Rankings.



The NBA Franchise Rankings.

Who do you think are the greatest franchises in NBA history well here’s my top 10 so look this is very subjective so here’s the criteria I’m using to rank teams so at number 10 I’m taking the Dallas Mavericks that franchise has just crushed it over the last 25 years but

Despite only winning two championships the Houston Rockets have had at least one Mega star in every single decade I wish more franchises had a unique brand like the Pistons they’re eight heat culture is a real thing man there’s a reason LeBron like left and they haven’t missed a beat I’m taking the Chicago

Bulls at six just because I don’t think they’ve been quite relevant enough outside of the Jordan era which is kind of the opposite of the Sixers they’ve always had star power but they’ve never had a dynasty and then I think the top four is pretty straightforward I got the

Warriors at four the Spurs machine at three the Celtics at two but at number one no team has had the combination of star power and success like the Lakers

44 Comments

  1. Celtics are 1 personally (no bias as a Celtics fan) because we have more of a homegrown legacy. Most of our all time greats were acquired through the draft or picked up and made great. Not to mention that the Lakers are only who they are because they wanted to be better than the Celtics. We were the team to beat and still kinda are despite slowing down the past couple of decades.

  2. Warriors should be #3 over spurs tbh šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø , been more relavent the past decade and got more champs and hall of famers then spurs šŸ¤”

  3. Its how everywhere else in sports major league or not, there is discussion about the best franchise historically, while in NBA the top 3 is very set in stone

  4. I’m putting Lakers all time starting lineup against Celtics all time starting lineup all day and they will win 100 times over.

  5. How can you say the bulls haven't been relevent since the jordan era but put Warriors ? Warriors were never relevant till they got Steph Klay and Draymond before then all the warriors did was have losing season besides the We believe Run. I would put Bulls over them

  6. its wild putting the golden state above bulls. before curry, they are trash. after curry… we havent see it yet so i dont know. but at least bulls have 6 rings during jordan era, GS curry only 4.

  7. Lakers, bulls, warriors, Celtics, spurs. Ok Celtics got bird and Russell but other then that they got 3 old guys in 08 to win 1 chip and been mediocre since. Jordan’s era/curry’s era were more impactful to nba/outside nba šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø

  8. Bulls should still be higher, if 2 rings can pull the rockets in top 10, bulls’ six make them top 5 automatically

  9. So Bulls get pushed down for not being ā€œrelevantā€ outside of the Jordan era but the Spurs are 3? What have they done that’s better than the Bulls without TD? šŸ˜‚

  10. The bucks I think deserve to be on here cause they have had really dominant players like Kareem and Giannis and have been relevant for a while and I think more relevant than the mavs

  11. The spurs? They're ass now and have been for a few years. They definitely go at 10. That duncan era wasn't *that* good

  12. So the team with 6 more hof players and the same amount of championships isn’t better (I’m a mavs fan not biased)

  13. If we’re talking extended periods of success, all-star players, and off court reputation, I don’t think the Rockets are over the Bucks, they both have two rings and both have consistently had all stars (Kareem, Ray Allen, Oscar Robertson, and Giannis for the Bucks) but the Bucks definitely have a better off court reputation.

  14. 1) Lakers
    2) Celtics
    3) Warriors
    4) Spurs
    5) Bulls
    6) Sixers
    7) Knicks
    8) Pistons
    9) Heat
    10) Rockets

  15. Bro with that same logic the spurs should be lower than they only dominated with Tim and the Admiral but besides those two they have not had any success so by that logic and reasoning the bulls should be as high as the spurs

  16. As a Lakers fan id put the Celtics above us and swap the spurs for the Warriors. The Spurs were really only relevant during the Duncan era and the Warriors were relevant before Curry

  17. Most of Bostons championships came when part time janitors were still playing. They also had a super team. Literally the Dodgers but if the rest of the league was horrible

  18. Lakers at 1 is a shame like yeah the Lakers all time team is better but the same amount of chips more hall of famers and had the most dominant run in sports history

Write A Comment