Mastodon
@Atlanta Hawks

Win or lose, what’s most important is that Tony saves a little money ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿพ



Win or lose, what’s most important is that Tony saves a little money ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿพ

by hollow-ataraxia

15 Comments

  1. ahend1999

    Heโ€™s never going to sell the team ๐Ÿ™

  2. Both_Funny4896

    bro at every game swag surfing and shit but cant spend a little extra money on the team ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

  3. MiserableSoft2344

    That sounds like a salary dump to me!

  4. cmhall25

    “Grimes has also come up in multiple trade discussions with the Atlanta Hawks for guardย **Dejounte Murray**ย and a separate smaller discussion involvingย **AJ Griffin**”

    Love that we’re zeroed in on Grimes.

  5. Atl-Fan_FTS

    Okay Iโ€™m serious. I would 100% be down to go to multiple games if we can coordinate sell the team chants, and get on the broadcast after game with signs like the Fire Nate legend. Iโ€™m so over this fucking ownership and FO

  6. FireworkFuse

    nothing warmS my hEart more than seeing a biLLionaire save money. Truly brings a tEAr to My eye

  7. UnregulatedRacoon

    I’d love Hyland as a 6th man pace pusher

  8. FiremaneNetrunner

    I could do the work to research this info, but Iโ€™m lazy. Iโ€™d love to know the number of teams that have had sustained success, championship pedigree or wins, and deep playoff runs that didnโ€™t pay the tax and managed their teams in a similar way. Iโ€™m assuming successful ownership have generally spent into the tax in order to win the championship. And if Iโ€™m right, weโ€™re going to be chasing mediocrity and short runs as long as Ressler continues his cheap escapade.

  9. ATLSmith

    Okay armchair Owners/GM’s, ever think that maybe they value cap flexibility for future trades and contracts?

    [https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryantoporek/2023/09/27/record-setting-nba-contracts-could-create-a-market-inefficiency/?sh=30178268431f](https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryantoporek/2023/09/27/record-setting-nba-contracts-could-create-a-market-inefficiency/?sh=30178268431f)

    ​

    >The new CBA contains an array of restrictions for the league’s highest-spending teams, particularly regarding trades and free agency. Beginning next summer, teams that go over the second salary-cap apron (somewhere between $18-19 million over the luxury-tax line) won’t have access to the taxpayer mid-level exception in free agency, can’t trade first-round picks seven years in the future, can’t aggregate salaries in trades, can’t receive players via sign-and-trade and can’t even receive contracts in return if they sign-and-trade their own players away.
    >
    > Those penalties will make it significantly harder for teams with expensive payrolls to round out their rosters outside of the draft. The new CBA is effectively designed to [promote more leaguewide parity](https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryantoporek/2023/04/05/nbas-new-cba-appears-aimed-at-increasing-leaguewide-parity/) and prevent teams with the wealthiest owners from outspending the rest of their counterparts.

  10. Bowie_Nichols

    Yโ€™all will sleep much better when you make peace with the truth about billionaire owners.

    Most of them donโ€™t give 2 shits about the team. Itโ€™s just another widget for them to sell.

  11. WildBananna

    Fucking start the chants people. If you attend games, PLEASE, start the chants

  12. WildBananna

    START THE CHANTS! START THE CHANTS! START THE CHANTS!

Write A Comment