Well technically their 60’s and 70’s titles belong to the Clippers.
SouthBayLaker23
Don’t let those losers make you doubt that the MIN titles count. They know even though they lead by one title(in NBA), the Lakers are the better franchise.
HellveticaNeue
Simmons always talks shit about how the Knicks haven’t been relevant since the 70s. Meanwhile, the Celtics have had 2 titles since 1986, while the Lakers have had 8.
Or another way… most of the Celtics titles are from there were 8 teams in the league. What a fucking joke.
ORaygoza
Two years in a row now that the Lakers werent involved in the finals yet the teams take shots at us. talk about rent free.
kiboyski
18 franchise titles. 2nd in the last 16yrs. Meanwhile the Lakers won 3 titles since 2008.
Own-Photo7078
The NBA counts them so they count.
Every team west of the Mississippi relocated or is an expansion team. The East coast teams use that as an excuse so they get a head start.
They all count
RemoveHuman
Rent free.
PretzelMan96
From Minneapolis titles to Mickey Mouse ring, people will grasp at anything. But as we all know, they wouldn’t be saying the same shit if it was their team.
DonStockton64
The Boston media mafia will do anything to discredit the Lakers. If it’s not the bubble then it’s the Minneapolis rings. Having 11 rings before the moon landing is all I need to know about which rings are relevant and which ones aren’t
crankydogs
How about no pre merger championships should count. Who cares about when the NBA was basically the same popularity as the WNBA today.
Idiotecka
fuck it. they all count.
Wise_Ad_112
Elgin Baylor started his career in Minneapolis and the team moved to la and he finished it in la. So going by these clowns, his years in Minneapolis and ROY award don’t count either? If the team had moved while Mikan was on it then he would be in la. The franchise lakers own the titles not the city.
I’ve said before the Larry bird titles to now belong to the clippers then. Legally.
12 Comments
Well technically their 60’s and 70’s titles belong to the Clippers.
Don’t let those losers make you doubt that the MIN titles count. They know even though they lead by one title(in NBA), the Lakers are the better franchise.
Simmons always talks shit about how the Knicks haven’t been relevant since the 70s. Meanwhile, the Celtics have had 2 titles since 1986, while the Lakers have had 8.
Or another way… most of the Celtics titles are from there were 8 teams in the league. What a fucking joke.
Two years in a row now that the Lakers werent involved in the finals yet the teams take shots at us. talk about rent free.
18 franchise titles. 2nd in the last 16yrs. Meanwhile the Lakers won 3 titles since 2008.
The NBA counts them so they count.
Every team west of the Mississippi relocated or is an expansion team. The East coast teams use that as an excuse so they get a head start.
They all count
Rent free.
From Minneapolis titles to Mickey Mouse ring, people will grasp at anything. But as we all know, they wouldn’t be saying the same shit if it was their team.
The Boston media mafia will do anything to discredit the Lakers. If it’s not the bubble then it’s the Minneapolis rings. Having 11 rings before the moon landing is all I need to know about which rings are relevant and which ones aren’t
How about no pre merger championships should count. Who cares about when the NBA was basically the same popularity as the WNBA today.
fuck it. they all count.
Elgin Baylor started his career in Minneapolis and the team moved to la and he finished it in la. So going by these clowns, his years in Minneapolis and ROY award don’t count either? If the team had moved while Mikan was on it then he would be in la. The franchise lakers own the titles not the city.
I’ve said before the Larry bird titles to now belong to the clippers then. Legally.