Which NBA Franchise Is More Impressive? 👀🏀
I’m going to name you two NBA teams. I want you to tell me which one has the better overall history. The Lakers or the Celtics. So 50/50. It’s glitz and glamour. Finding ways to replenish the star power versus getting it out the mud, building the right way over and over again. If you have like a consensus top 10 players in NBA history, four to five of them played on Lakers. The accolades are the same. The clout is the same. Lakers got volume of stars. I might be the only tiebreaker. They also all won championships in a Lakers uniform. Sounds like we have the correct answer here. The Mavs or the Rockets? Probably the Houston Rockets. They went back to back. Mavs only won one. The Mavs preark Cuban are known as like an abomination, an embarrassment of a franchise. And you just traded away Luca Donets. I’m sorry. You can’t win. Your history cannot be considered great when your second greatest player got unceremoniously fired. Spurs versus Bulls. I’m just going to lean the Bulls. The most popular player in NBA history. Play for the Bulls. Like they got it. They won the six rings. That’s obviously like the peak you can possibly have for a decade. The Spurs almost matched that without the greatest player of all time. And they did over a long stretch of history. to replenish their star power over and over.
Which NBA team are you taking? #nba
45 Comments
Watch this week’s episode to see us grade every NBA star’s playoffs performance and more‼️‼️
It is crazy that the Mavs were an embarrassment pre and post Cuban lol. He really is just a good businessman and a good guy– gets shit done.
It’s extremely hard to not pick the team that Michael Jordan played for
Overall it's the Spurs, but..I meeeean come on it's MJ be fr 😂
The spurs were relevant for DECADES that longevity is unmatched with any other franchise imo. But I get the argument for the bulls too
Lakers blow the Celtics away. The biggest part to this rivalry is that they're fighting over who has the most championships (Celtics currently up 1), but the majority of the Celtics rings came pre-merger, while the Lakers have been THE premier franchise of the 21st century (Celtics have won 2 rings since Bird and Magic retired, while the Lakers have won 6).
I agree with Bulls over Spurs for now, but it's close, and Wemby is probably going to tip it the other way soon.
Mavs vs Rockets isn't even a conversation.
Let’s be real the Celtics and Lakers share even history of eliteness to be fair. Like it will be hard to pick one without saying why you didn’t pick the other.
Mavs have the hardest ring in history and that's a fact.
Celtics
It’s Celtics ez they’re all time winning percentage is much better than the lakers and they have 1 more ring. Spurs are also ez for the same reason
Lakers needed a dirty officiating squad to get them the title over Portland and Sacramento
How did the spurs replenish over and over when they were only good during the Tim Duncan era???
I know 6 rings is 6 rings but I cannot in good conscience put them on the same level as winning 2 threepeats vs winning over a longer period of time
Bulls had star power they just had it most of it at one time and it showed in 6 rings
YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW GOOD TIM DUNCAN WAS!!!11!!11!!!!
Sorry, I love that meme so much because it's insanely true and people often forget about how monstrous the spurs were in general over the years.
Spurs vs bulls is 100% bulls, I live in the Netherlands, if you ask anyone to name any nba team, they'll 99% of the time say the Chicago bulls, MJ gives them an insane push
Celtics
Rockets
Spurs
Celtics vs Lakers feel like having more stars makes it worse? If everything else is the same accomplishment wise?
We have the toughest ring of all time foh
LeBron, Kareem, Magic, Wilt, Kobe, Shaq all played for the Lakers. That’s 6 top 10 players OAT.
Isaac knows how to make a hit for his goat 😅😂
Cs better than lakers some of they rings they didn’t even win in LA lol
Celtics having a majority of their rings in a relatively non-competitive league, with limited success in the post-ABA merger outside of Bird puts then far below the Lakers, hell even the Spurs.
Lakers easily 11 of the Celtics rings cam when there were no other good teams
Nah, y'all started out with an L. I can't hate on the Lakers since they had the best player from my alum, the Logo himself, but Celtics have more 'ships and are 9-3 in playoff series against the Lakers. Crew's pulling a Mo and getting blinded by that glitz and glamor
Spurs v Bulls is really interesting. But the Bulls having two separate three peats in the same decade is hard to top.
🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡
As a fan, I would get more entertainment value over the 15 years of being the Spurs fan, than the 8 years of being a Bulls fan. Since the peaks are close, I’ll go with the longevity
deport Isaac
Yes the Bulls have Jordan but the Spurs have more stars in their history. the alltime Spurs is better than the all time Bulls if you go 15 players deep. more non championship success. 22 seasons of straight playoffs, greatest coach, greatest pf, greatest front office, greatest culture, greatest prospect in wemby and current vibes are unmatched Spurs got the most exciting future of any team imo
If the Celtics didn't have Reggie Lewis, Len Bias and Petrovic die in the early 90s. Boston wouldn't have had as many down years as they did
Whenever people say “the right way” in sports i always imagine it comes from some dudes racist uncle trying to say why some random white player is better than everybody else lol obv thats now how they say it in this clip but others do
Micheal us so majestic 🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡
❤
Total body of work the spurs are way better then the bulls the bulls have had a lot of mid or bad seasons since mj not including the short stint with drose and the spurs made it to the playoffs TDs entire career which is like 19 or 20 seasons in a row
Bulls nations
lakers also having advantage of dominance in every decade. they’ve had a finals appearance every decade, and only have one decade without a ship, where the celtics have the 60s, 2 in the 70s, the 80s, then no real relevance until the late 2000s, then nothing til the last few years
As someone who didn’t watch basketball growing up
Comes from a country where not a lot of people watch basketball at all
There is no way in hell the Celtics have nearly as much clout as the lakers not even close
I’m going spurs over bulls Ik that’s crazy but hold on now what have they been after and before Jordan ? The spurs had a few dynasty eras not just known as thee dynasty. They had Robinson, TD aka the big fundamental, Leonard and some over great players that stayed for almost their whole career because of the culture they built.
We have more rings tho
Stop putting bron in lakers he never will be a real laker
Issac, the most bron sexual and laker lover of man kind.
Its gotta be the spurs. Outside of jordan’s 6 what the hell have the bulls done? They are a poverty franchise outside of jordan
Spurs had 22 straight playoff appearances, 5 titles, stars over different generations (Gervin, Robinson, Timmy, Kawhi, Wemby). Meanwhile the bulls have been booty cheeks outside of MJ’s era other than a couple of healthy D rose seasons. I’m going the spurs tbh
Spurs vs Bulls is tuff, but two three peats is what breaks it. That level of dominance is something never seen