Mastodon
@Los Angeles Clippers

Kawhi Leonard is the WORST SUPERSTAR Stephen A. Smith has ever seen in sports 😬 I First Take



Kawhi Leonard is the WORST SUPERSTAR Stephen A. Smith has ever seen in sports 😬 I First Take

On First Take, Stephen A. Smith and Chris “Mad Dog” Russo join Molly Qerim to discuss Kawhi Leonard’s signing a $28 million endorsement deal for a “no-show job” and whether an investigation should be conducted.

0:00 Kawhi Leonard signs a $28 million endorsement deal
0:30 Thoughts from an anonymous former Aspiration employee
1:04 Clippers statement
1:20 Stephen A. reacts
4:58 Mad Dog talks about the need for an investigation
6:00 Stephen A. speaks on the Clippers organization

☑️ Subscribe to ESPN+: https://plus.espn.com/
📱 Get the ESPN App: http://www.espn.com/espn/apps/espn
🏀 Subscribe to NBA on ESPN on YouTube: http://bit.ly/2yxs3Og
☑️ Subscribe to ESPN on YouTube: http://es.pn/SUBSCRIBEtoYOUTUBE
☑️ Watch ESPN on YouTube TV: http://es.pn/YouTubeTV

#ESPN #NBA

46 Comments

  1. People are superstars because thats what they make you think…Tyrese Halliburton wasnt anything special in Sacramento now all of the sudden he's a stud cause they turn the magnets on in crunch time…. nba is rigged af but we have nothing else to entertain us so we will watch whatever

  2. What is life about getting money for a BLACK MAN YALL MAD BECAUSE HE UNDERSTOOD THE ASSIGNMENT REMEMBER WHO YOU ARE MIXED BREED

  3. Pablo Torre has been in his JORDAN ERA ever since Bill Simmons criticized his reporting on Bill Belichick’s relationship with Jordan Hudson, describing it as “gutter journalism”!

  4. Bro reiterated that Balmer deserves the benefit of the doubt and proceeded to blame Khawi. Bias ahh take.

  5. SAS works for Disney/ESPN. They are partners with the NBA. SAS has to represent ESPN. He is going to go after the owner of a team, but a player is isn’t off limits

  6. Saying you’re always gonna give a billionaire “the benefit of the doubt” sound A LOT like Stephen a smith did something illegal for or with said billionaire

  7. There appears to be nothing to investigate. The facts are not disputed. The Clippers paid this company 300 Million and the company had a contract with Kawhi Leonard's company that would give it 28 Million for a "no show" job. The Clippers are not disputing the facts. What the Clippers are disputing is the conclusion that is made based on these facts. The Clippers are saying that what happened was not meant to circumvent the salary cap. The other side is saying it does. Most likely the NBA would say that what happened was probably a violation of the salary cap rules. The "no show" provision in the contract was the ultimate giveaway. Why give 28 Million for nothing unless it was really for something. And why go through all these shell corporations to do it if you were not hiding "something" fishy. For those with legal training these are called "badges of fraud". The other NBA owners must be fuming mad and it would not look right if the Clippers get away with this without a substantial penalty. The Spurs and the Raptors were complaining about the side deals that Uncle Dennis was trying to make that they did not agree to do. The ultimate vindication for the Spurs would be for KL to be declared a free agent and for the NBA to strip the Clippers of at least 5 first round picks similar to the Joe Smith scandal.

  8. Stephen A. never fails to disseminate a despicable take. Can you imagine how much Kawhi has made the franchise? Yet, disgustingly, we have someone who has no access to any financial reports claiming that Kawhi has essentially “stolen” money from the Clippers’ organization.

    Steve Ballmer has an incredible mind for business. Are we to believe that he’d keep Kawhi on the roster instead of buying out his contract if he were not fiscally valuable to the franchise? When it’s all said and done, like anything else, the NBA is a business. Kawhi is an asset, whether he’s on or off the court.

    Case closed.

Write A Comment