I hate these revisionist assholes. Who do they think they’re fooling?
DBlackIce
Not surprised they’re not gonna openly admit to a fuck up. Why would they everybody but us is gonna forget about this in a few days so 🤷♂️. Fuck the league tho
Safe_Look_1640
In what world is a hit to the head during an NBA game considered incidental?
Faliberti
i mean, they were never going to say differently than the ruling after review, that would be a terrible look. but how is any contact to the head ever minimal. You literally move a persons head throwing of their vision/focus, nevermind the fact that its not even a blocked or dislodged ball, brown kept control.
nibbinoo8
time to just move on at this point. it’s probably gonna get worse as betting companies get bigger.
HailKyrie
Funniest part is they said the Porzingis foul was incorrect and should’ve been a no call lmao
CofTheEast
They do this all the time I’m not even suprised. The L2M is biased joke
npboretti
Is it just me or does this explanation basically say that all contact is basically not a foul cause most of the time it’s in an effort to make a defensive play?
pwilkens
The big story here is that JB literally directly ASKED the red “did he hit my head” and the red said no. Changing stories.
KennyWop1612
They also said that Porzingis’ block attempt was legal. Before the Porzingis block, Miles Turner also committed two offensive fouls; one on Brown and another on White. Fucking refs need to be held accountable.
Objective_Breath7358
So you can foul. As long as you touch the ball.
Got it !
Realistic_Figure7796
Lol what did y’all expect it to say the refs were wrong our bad look who the report comes from the league
Myles Turner commits a moving screen on White with 2.0 remaining (incorrect non-call),
Porzingis does not foul Hield (incorrect call)
Lopsided-Wear7987
They doubled down. The balls on these guys.
Full-Flight-5211
It was a joke to begin with. Let’s all move onto the Twolves who we owe an ass whopping to!
Zdoon_dnes
Since when does contact have to be purposeful to be considered a foul? 99 percent of defensive fouls in the NBA are called because of inadvertent contact on a defensive play. To call the play on Brown a non-foul, and then slip in the comment about the Porzingis call being incorrect is a kick in the nuts. This shit needs to be investigated.
Otherwise-Career-538
Didn’t the refs outright say there was NO contact? Where’s this incidental contract suddenly coming from?
goli14
Incidental my ass. Clearly a foul. I was expecting better. Clearly NBA through their refs are controlling the narratives.
CALlCOJACK
they deadass got it wrong on both counts LMFAO
DunkingWizard
That’s it, I’m getting Gordan Hayward and we’re storming the NBA headquarters
Jokesiez
So they are saying fouls no longer exist unless the defender tackles the shooter. Got it
meselson-stahl
You know we ain’t just blowing smoke when 100% of r/NBA is on our side.
GooseMay0
So what they essentially did is “compromise” in their way. They weren’t going to admit they were wrong on the Hield overturned call but they’ll throw the Celtics a bone by saying they missed two calls on the next possession. Fucking corrupt bullshit.
Ayonanomous
NBA refs are bullshit shits trash
WoodpeckerExtreme249
Ya this stinks to high heaven. They can’t admit that they spent several minutes reviewing a play and STILL GOT IT WRONG. So instead they say they got the other call wrong, but that it was actually unreviewable. So instead of the story being “NBA royally screwed up a review” its “well, too bd that can’t be reviewed.” Just a clear case of trying to sweep this under the rug.
captaincumsock69
Regardless of all the fouls doesn’t Jaylen still have the ball when the whistle blows?
26 Comments
I hate these revisionist assholes. Who do they think they’re fooling?
Not surprised they’re not gonna openly admit to a fuck up. Why would they everybody but us is gonna forget about this in a few days so 🤷♂️. Fuck the league tho
In what world is a hit to the head during an NBA game considered incidental?
i mean, they were never going to say differently than the ruling after review, that would be a terrible look. but how is any contact to the head ever minimal. You literally move a persons head throwing of their vision/focus, nevermind the fact that its not even a blocked or dislodged ball, brown kept control.
time to just move on at this point. it’s probably gonna get worse as betting companies get bigger.
Funniest part is they said the Porzingis foul was incorrect and should’ve been a no call lmao
They do this all the time I’m not even suprised. The L2M is biased joke
Is it just me or does this explanation basically say that all contact is basically not a foul cause most of the time it’s in an effort to make a defensive play?
The big story here is that JB literally directly ASKED the red “did he hit my head” and the red said no. Changing stories.
They also said that Porzingis’ block attempt was legal. Before the Porzingis block, Miles Turner also committed two offensive fouls; one on Brown and another on White. Fucking refs need to be held accountable.
So you can foul. As long as you touch the ball.
Got it !
Lol what did y’all expect it to say the refs were wrong our bad look who the report comes from the league
For anyone who wants to read: https://official.nba.com/l2m/L2MReport.html?gameId=0022300507
Other interesting lines from the last 3 sec:
Myles Turner commits a moving screen on White with 2.0 remaining (incorrect non-call),
Porzingis does not foul Hield (incorrect call)
They doubled down. The balls on these guys.
It was a joke to begin with. Let’s all move onto the Twolves who we owe an ass whopping to!
Since when does contact have to be purposeful to be considered a foul? 99 percent of defensive fouls in the NBA are called because of inadvertent contact on a defensive play. To call the play on Brown a non-foul, and then slip in the comment about the Porzingis call being incorrect is a kick in the nuts. This shit needs to be investigated.
Didn’t the refs outright say there was NO contact? Where’s this incidental contract suddenly coming from?
Incidental my ass. Clearly a foul. I was expecting better. Clearly NBA through their refs are controlling the narratives.
they deadass got it wrong on both counts LMFAO
That’s it, I’m getting Gordan Hayward and we’re storming the NBA headquarters
So they are saying fouls no longer exist unless the defender tackles the shooter. Got it
You know we ain’t just blowing smoke when 100% of r/NBA is on our side.
So what they essentially did is “compromise” in their way. They weren’t going to admit they were wrong on the Hield overturned call but they’ll throw the Celtics a bone by saying they missed two calls on the next possession. Fucking corrupt bullshit.
NBA refs are bullshit shits trash
Ya this stinks to high heaven. They can’t admit that they spent several minutes reviewing a play and STILL GOT IT WRONG. So instead they say they got the other call wrong, but that it was actually unreviewable. So instead of the story being “NBA royally screwed up a review” its “well, too bd that can’t be reviewed.” Just a clear case of trying to sweep this under the rug.
Regardless of all the fouls doesn’t Jaylen still have the ball when the whistle blows?